Comparison of self-reported and test-identified chlamydial infections among young adults in the United States of America

Citation

Iritani, B. J.; Ford, C. A.; Miller, W. C.; Hallfors, D. D.; & Halpern, C. T. (2006). Comparison of self-reported and test-identified chlamydial infections among young adults in the United States of America. Sex Health. vol. 3 (4) pp. 245-251

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Many studies rely on respondent reports of prior diagnosed sexually transmissible infections (STIs), but these self reports are likely to under-estimate infection prevalence. The extent of bias from using self-reported STI data, and whether bias varies by sex and race, is largely unknown. This gap is addressed using a large, nationally representative sample. METHODS: Cross-sectional analyses of Wave III of the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health. Participants were 18-26 years old (n = 12,359). Estimates of the prevalence of chlamydial infection based on self-reported diagnoses in the past year were compared with actual prevalence based on nucleic acid amplification testing (NAAT) at the time of data collection. Ratios of test-identified prevalence to self-reported diagnosis prevalence were calculated by sex and race/ethnicity groups. Larger ratios indicate greater extent of self reports under-estimating infection prevalence. RESULTS: About 4.2% of the sample had a current NAAT-identified chlamydial infection, but only 3.0% reported having been diagnosed with chlamydia in the past year, yielding a ratio of 1.43. The ratio of test-identified infection prevalence to prevalence identified from self-reported diagnoses was larger among men than women (2.07 versus 1.14, P < 0.05). Among men, the ratio was larger among non-Hispanic blacks (2.40) compared with non-Hispanic whites (1.07, P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Use of self-reported diagnoses under-estimates chlamydial infection prevalence, particularly among men, and among non-Hispanic black men. Reliance on self-reported STIs may consequently lead to biased conclusions, particularly for these groups. Use of biological testing for STIs in research studies is recommended.

URL

http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/SH06040

Keyword(s)

Adolescent

Notes

Iritani, Bonita J

Reference Type

Journal Article

Journal Title

Sex Health

Author(s)

Iritani, B. J.
Ford, C. A.
Miller, W. C.
Hallfors, D. D.
Halpern, C. T.

Year Published

2006

Volume Number

3

Issue Number

4

Pages

245-251

Edition

2006/11/23

ISSN/ISBN

1448-5028 (Print)

DOI

10.1071/SH06040

Reference ID

1780