Gender differences in the predictors of juvenile delinquency

Citation

Daigle, Leah E.; Cullen, Francis T.; & Wright, John Paul (2007). Gender differences in the predictors of juvenile delinquency. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice. vol. 5 (3) pp. 254-286

Abstract

At the heart of the gender-specificity debate is the argument that gender-neutral theories cannot adequately explain female delinquency. Instead, it has been asserted that theories should incorporate risk factors that capture females' unique experiences. In this context, the current study uses data from the National Longitudinal Survey of Adolescent Health to address the generality-specificity debate. The analysis includes variables not only from traditional criminological theories and the newer life-course approach but also from the feminist perspective. Results from multivariate analyses show that although there are some similarities in the predictors of male and female delinquency, differences also emerged. Variables measuring general strain and involvement are stronger predictors for males, whereas only attachment to school is stronger for females. One feminist theory variable and one life-course variable exhibit stronger effects in the models for females. The implications of these findings and suggestions for future research are also addressed.

URL

http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1541204007301289

Keyword(s)

Crime & delinquency

Reference Type

Journal Article

Journal Title

Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice

Author(s)

Daigle, Leah E.
Cullen, Francis T.
Wright, John Paul

Year Published

2007

Volume Number

5

Issue Number

3

Pages

254-286

ISSN/ISBN

1541-2040

DOI

10.1177/1541204007301289

Reference ID

768